 |
 |

|
Outcomes
and other research involving Gamma Knife treatment have been authored
by Northwest Hospital Gamma Knife Center physicians, and documented
in various papers and publications. These papers are cited throughout
this section. Some abstract and article citations are available on
the PubMed section of the National
Library of Medicine website. PubMed includes links to many sites
providing full text articles (registration is required on some of
these sites to view articles).
| |
|
| 
|

Within six months of treatment, 60% of patients are free of facial
pain and are able to discontinue all medications. Another 30%
are pain free using a small does of medication, which does not
produce side effects. Thus 90% of patients are successfully treated
with Gamma Knife. With long-term follow-up the overall success
rate drops to about 75%, which is similar to the long-term success
rate of microvascular decompression and better than that of radiofrequency,
glycerol, or balloon treatment. A second treatment may be performed
if the first treatment was unsuccessful or if the pain recurs
after an initial successful treatment. About 80% of patients treated
a second time obtain either complete or near complete relief of
trigeminal neuralgia pain. About 15% of treated patients will
develop temporary facial numbness usually 6-9 months after the
procedures and about 5% will develop permanent facial numbness.
Although particularly bothersome at first, most patients with
facial numbness rapidly get used to it and most are delighted
to exchange their facial pains for some numbness.
Many patients who suffer from facial pain have symptoms that
are not completely typical of trigeminal neuralgia. These atypical
features include a constant background aching facial pain, spread
of pain beyond the normal area supplied by the trigeminal nerve
(such as the head or the neck), and absence of the trigger areas
from which typical trigeminal nerve pain can be activated. All
forms of medical and surgical treatment including Gamma Knife
treatment are not as successful in these atypical forms of facial
pain as in typical trigeminal neuralgia. Gamma Knife treatment
of patients with atypical symptoms results in complete pain relief
only rarely. About 60% of Gamma Knife treated patients will gain
at least a 50% reduction in their facial pain. Later recurrence
of pain is more common in patients with atypical symptoms than
in those with typical trigeminal neuralgia. The risk of facial
numbness is no different in patients with atypical symptoms compared
to patients with typical trigeminal neuralgia.
Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD, Flickinger JC, Young
RF, Vermeulen SS, Duma CM, Jacques DB, Rand RW, Regis J, Peragut
JC, Epstein MH, Lindquist C: Stereotactic Radiosurgery for trigeminal
neuralgia: A Multi-Institution Study Using the Gamma Unit, J
Neurosurg 1996 Jun; 84(6): 940-945
Young RF, Vermeulen SS, Grimm P, Blasko
J, Posewitz A: Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for treatment of trigeminal
neuraligia: idiopathic and tumor relation. Neurology
1997; 48(3):608-614.
Young RF, Vermeulen SS, Posewitz A.: Gamma
Knife radiosurgery for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia,
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg, 1998; 70(Suppl 1): 192-199.
Young RF, Stereotactic radiosurgery of
the trigeminal nerve root for treatment of trigeminal neuralgia,
in Neurosurgical Operative Atlas Volume 7. S. Rengchary,
R.Wilkins, eds., American Association of Neurological Surgeons
Publications, 1997; 87-91
Young RF, Radiosurgery versus Microsurgery
for trigeminal neuralgia, Current Techniques in Neurosurgery.
M Saleman, ed, Current Medicine, Inc., Springer, 1998; 35-43.
Young RF, Treatment of trigeminal neuralgia
by radiosurgery with the Gamma Knife. In: Fisher WS, ed. Perspectives
in Neurological Surgery, New York: Thieme, 1999; 9(2): 1-16

Gamma Knife thalamotomy has been proven a safe and effective surgical treatment alternative for Essential Tremor. The Gamma Knife Center neurological staff have performed over 300 thalamotomy procedures for ET since 1993. Over 85% of the patients have achieved either total or near total loss of their tremors. While it is particularly applicable to patients who are not ideal candidates for deep brain stimulation, it can be offered to all patients who are considering surgical intervention for ET.
Young RF, Vermeulen SS, Meier R, Li F: Gamma Knife Thalamotomy for Treatment of Essential Tremor: Long-Term Results, J Neurosurg 2009 Nov; 0(0): 1-7.
Young RF, Vermeulen SS, Posewitz A., Grimm P,
Blasko J, Jacques DB, Rand RW, Copcutt BC: Functional Neurosurgery
with the Leksell Gamma Knife; Radiosurg 1996; 218-228.
Young RF: Functional Neurosurgery with
the Leksell Gamma Knife, Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1996;
66(1-3):19-23.
Young RF: Gamma Knife Radiosurgery as
a Lesioning Technique for Movement Disorder Surgery, LD Lunsford,
topic ed, JA Jane, ed, Neurosurgical Focus 1997 Mar;
3(3).
Young RF, Shumway-Cook A, Vermeulen SS,
Grimm P, Blasko J, Posewitz A, Burkhart WA, Goiney RC: Gamma
Knife radiosurgery as a lesioning technique in movement disorder
surgery. J Neursurg 1998 Aug; 89(2):183-193.
Young RF, Jacques S, Mark R, Kopyov O,
Copcutt B, Posewits A, Li, F: Gamma Knife thalamotomy for treatment
of tremor: long-term results, J Neurosurg, (Suppl 3)
2000; 93: 128-135.
Young, RF. Gamma Knife Treatment for Movement
Disorders, Seminars in Neurosurgery, 2001, Volume 12: 233-243.
Young RF, Posewitz A., Non-Invasive Lesioning:
Functional Radiosurgery. In Alexander EB III and Maciunas RM,
eds. Advanced Neurosurgical Navigation. New York: Thieme, 1999;
41:507-517.
Young RF. Clinical applications: Pain,
Movement Disorders, and Epilspy. In: German IM, ed. LINAC and
Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, Park Ridge, Illinios, American Association
of Neurological Surgeons: 2000; 231-252.
Young RF. The Gamma Knife in Movement
Disorder Surgery. In Lozano AM, ed Movement Disorder Surgery
Progress and Challenges, Basel: Karger, 1999.
Young RF. Gamma Knife Treatment for Movement
Disorders. InSeminars in Neurosurgery, ed Advances in Neurosurgical
Treatment of Movement Disorders. New York: Thieme, 2001, 12(2):
233-243

On the average, over 90% of acoustic neuromas treated with Gamma
Knife show disappearance, shrinkage, or no growth after treatment.
Hearing is preserved in more than half of the patients treated
with the Gamma Knife and for smaller tumors the rate of hearing
preservation may approach 70% or more. Hearing loss, which does
occur after Gamma Knife treatment, is usually gradual so patients
who may have lost hearing the other ear have a chance to learn
other communication skills and adjust to their impending hearing
loss. Such a problem arises in patients whose acoustic neuroma
is related to Neurofibromatosis because these patients experience
acoustic neuromas on both sides.
Permanent facial paralysis after Gamma Knife treatment of acoustic
neuromas is now rare, probably occurring in 1-2% of patients.
The reduction in the rate of facial paralysis is due to the reduced
dosages of radiation now being used to treat acoustic neuromas,
compared to the past. Facial numbness, dizziness (vertigo), nausea,
and balance problems are also uncommon after Gamma Knife treatment.
In a previous publication, our Gamma Knife team found that tiny
acoustic neuromas located within the bony internal auditory canal
(intracanilicular tumors) were more prone to side effects of Gamma
Knife treatment than were larger tumors. Other published studies
showed better outcomes for Gamma Knife treatment in comparison
to outcomes after surgery, where complications including spinal
fluid leakage, infections, post-operative blood clots, and anesthetic
complications were common. It is important to understand that
surgery may not be a cure for acoustic neuroma. Patients we have
treated with the Gamma Knife have had recurrences of the tumor
after previous surgery.
Vermuelen SS, Young RF, Posewitz A, Grimm P,
Blasko J, Kohler E: Stereotactic radiosurgery toxicity in the
treatment of intracanalicular acoustic neuromas: the Seattle
Northwest Gamma Knife experience, Sterotact Funct Neurosurg,
1998; 70 (Suppl 1):80-87.

In the experience of the Northwest Hospital Gamma Knife Center
about 30% of treated meningiomas will completely disappear after
treatment. Thirty percent will shrink in size but still be seen
on follow-up MRI scans. Another 30% will not shrink but will not
grow either. About 10% of meningiomas will continue to grow in
spite of Gamma Knife treatment. Options available in that case
include a second Gamma Knife treatment, surgical removal of the
tumor, or in some cases radiation therapy or chemotherapy. Most
meningiomas are benign but small percentages are malignant and
continue to grow in spite of all forms of treatment.
We have not experienced any deaths attributable to Gamma Knife
treatment but some patients have experienced temporary or in rare
cases permanent side effects of the treatments. We have found
that we have better results and very minimal side effects when
we treat meningiomas located at the base of the skull compared
to those located near the top of the head. Our experience in comparing
the treatment of meningiomas in these two locations has been published.
Even large meningiomas or those located close to important structures
such as the optic nerves may be treated with Gamma Knife. In such
cases we may recommend more than one treatment, perhaps separated
by several months.
Vermuelen SS, Young RF, Li, F, Meier R, Raisis
J, Klein S., Kohler E: A Comparison of Single Fraciton Radiosurgery
Tumor Control and Toxicity in the Treatment of Basal and Nonbasal
Meningiomas, Sterotact Funct Neurosurg, 1999; 72 (Suppl
1) 60-65.

In several studies, Gamma Knife radiosurgical treatment has been
shown to significantly improve the survival of patients with malignant
gliomas when used as a boost treatment following completion of
radiation therapy. When Gamma Knife treatment is delayed until
the tumor has recurred or progressed, the benefits are less evident.
We recommend that all patients with malignant gliomas be evaluated
for a Gamma Knife radiosurgical boost treatment immediately following
completion of radiation therapy.
Sometimes patients with malignant tumors seek Gamma Knife treatment
before surgery or in the hopes of avoiding either surgery or radiation
therapy. We do not believe that radiosurgery alone is a sufficient
treatment for malignant gliomas because these tumors infiltrate
into the brain beyond where they may appear on scanning images.
We believe the best treatment for malignant gliomas combines all
of the available treatments into a cohesive overall treatment
plan. Complications of Gamma Knife treatment in the form of brain
swelling are more common than after the treatment of other types
of tumors. However, such complications can usually by managed
with steroid medications.
Young RF: The Role of the Gamma Knife in the
Treatment of Malignant Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors,
CA Cancer J Clin 1998 May-Jun; 48(3):177-188.
Young RF: Radiosurgery for the treatment of brain metastases.
Seminars in Surgical Oncology 1998 Jan-Feb; 14(1):70-78
Larson DA, Gutin PH, McDermott M, Lamborn K, Sneed PK, Wara
WM, Flickinger JC, Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD, Hudgins WR, Friehs
GM, Haselsberger K, Leber K, Pendl G, Chung SS, Coffey RJ, Dinapoli
R, Shaw EG, Vermeulen S, Young RF, Hirato M, Inouhe HK, Ohye
CC, Shibazaki T: Gamma Knife for glioma: Selection factors and
survival. Comment in: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1996
Dec 1; 36(5):1279-1280 and Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
1996 Dec 1; 36(5): 1045-1053.
Young RF, Vermeulen SS, Posewitz AE, Jacques DB, Rand RW, Duma
CM, Copcutt BC, Henderson J, Bolles GE, Breeze RE, Johnson SD,
Pribil SG: Abstract. Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Treatment
of Multiple Brain Metastases, Stereotact Funct Neurosurg
1995; 64:92-93.
Young RF, Jacques DB, Duma CM, Rand RW, Henderson J, Vermeulen
SS, Grimm P, Blasko JC, Posewitz A, Copcutt BC, Bolles GE, Breeze
RE, Pribil SG, Winston K, Johnson SD: Gamma Knife Radiosurgery
for Treatment of Multiple Brain Metastases: A Comparison of
Patients with Single versus Multiple Lesions, Radiosurg
1996; 92-101.

Pituitary tumors may cause excess secretion of hormones leading
to high levels of prolactin, growth hormone, or the hormone that
cause the production of cortisone (ACTH). These conditions may
cause infertility, Acromegaly, or Cushing’s Syndrome. Some
pituitary tumors do not produce excessive hormones but may grow
and cause pressure on the optic nerves leading to loss of vision.
In some cases pituitary tumors do not produce excessive hormones
but may grow and cause pressure on the optic nerves leading to
loss of vision.
In other cases, pituitary tumors destroy the cells that normally
produce pituitary hormones leading to a condition called hypopituitarism.
In that situation it is necessary for the patient to take hormone
replacement medications. The Gamma Knife may be used to treat
pituitary adenomas either as primary treatment or to treat tumors
which are still present after partial surgical removal or which
may recur after what had originally appeared to be a surgical
cure. The Northwest Hospital Gamma Knife Center presented results
of a study (in combination with a Los Angles Gamma Knife Center)
at the 2002 annual meeting of the American Association of Neurological
Surgeons held in Chicago. For large pituitary tumors that press
on the optic nerves and cause loss of vision, we usually recommend
surgical removal first with Gamma Knife treatment of any residual
tumor. For smaller tumors the Gamma Knife is an option as well
as an initial treatment.

Not all types of pain respond to Gamma Knife treatment and the
overall success rate is about 60%. Sometimes combining Gamma Knife
treatment and another procedure called bilateral cingulotomy will
result in pain relief when either procedure alone is unsuccessful.
Our goal is to try to reduce the patient’s pain by at least
50% because total relief of pain is difficult to achieve.
Young RF, Jacques DB, Rand RW, Copcutt BC,
Vermeulen SS, Posewitz AE: Gamma Knife Thalamotomy for the Treatment
of Persistent Pain, Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1995;
64 Suppl 1:172-181
Young RF. Ablative Brain Operations for
Chronic Pain: Loeser JD, ed. Bonica’s Management of
Pain. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,
2001; 2048-2066.
Back to Top
| |
| |
|
|